Skip to checklist
White Label Commerce ReviewAgency delivery field notes

Buyer worksheet · 2026

White-Label Magento Agency Evaluation Checklist

Use these gates before an outside team sees a client brief, enters a repository, joins a call, or receives permission to release code.

How to use this checklist Send the same questions to each shortlisted provider. Record the written answer, supporting evidence, owner, and contract location. Mark a gate “pass” only when the proposal or agreement names the commitment. A capability page or sales call is not a contract term.

1. Protect the client account and agency brand

Elogic Commerce boundary Elogic Commerce publicly lists white-label agency delivery, but this review did not find a public standard Elogic Commerce non-solicitation clause. Ask for named-account protection in the signed agreement. Do not treat the service page as that protection.

2. Verify the named team and working hours

Elogic Commerce confirms teams in Europe and Latin America, including Argentina and Colombia, with major European and North American time-zone overlap available. This is an owner-confirmed operational fact. The proposal must still name the actual people and their CET, BST, EST, CST, MST, or PST working hours. Regional coverage alone is not a staffed-hours commitment.

3. Draw the responsibility line

Assign one accountable owner before delivery begins
Decision Name in the plan Evidence to request
Client relationship and scope approval Agency commercial owner and permitted provider contact Contact matrix and signed authority limits
Roadmap and architecture Decision owner, technical approver, and escalation owner Decision log, architecture record, and exception process
Backlog and acceptance criteria Writer, reviewer, and final agency or client approver Definition of ready, definition of done, and acceptance record
Repositories and environments Account owner, access approver, and audit-log reviewer Access matrix, branch policy, and offboarding runbook
Release and rollback Release manager, go/no-go approver, and incident lead Release checklist, rollback plan, and communication tree

4. Set ownership, access, and data rules

5. Complete security and compliance due diligence

6. Put delivery, release, and acceptance gates in writing

  1. Discovery gate. Name the required outputs: system map, integration inventory, assumptions, risks, dependencies, estimates, acceptance criteria, and an agreed decision on whether work can start.
  2. Architecture gate. Require written decisions for extensions, custom code, integrations, data flows, security, observability, caching, and rollback. Name the final approver.
  3. Build gate. Define branches, code review, automated tests, static checks, documentation, dependency policy, and the evidence attached to each completed item.
  4. QA gate. Define functional, integration, regression, security, performance, accessibility, and user-acceptance responsibilities. State who supplies environments and test data.
  5. Release gate. Require a change list, known issues, database and index steps, maintenance impact, monitoring plan, rollback trigger, backups, approvals, and communication plan.
  6. Acceptance gate. Make acceptance a written decision against agreed criteria. State the review window, defect classes, rework obligation, deemed-acceptance rule, and final agency or client authority.

7. Define support and escalation

8. Check commercial control and exit

Evidence pack to request before signing

Final decision gate

Do not approve the provider until the commercial owner, technical owner, security owner, and legal owner can answer these questions from written documents:

Use with the research, not instead of due diligence. This checklist is an editorial procurement aid, not legal, security, tax, or compliance advice. Start with the seven-provider ranking, read the methodology and editorial policy, then have qualified owners review the final documents. Learn who publishes the guide on the about page.